| Letter#5
Democratic and Authoritative Religion
|
|
| My dear Mr. Isaacs: |
|
| Looking at my
last letter, in order to bring to mind the point dealt with therein, I realized that the
closing words were in the nature of a challenge. Hence there was no need of an apology for
immediately coming back at me with a reply thereto. It places upon me however the
responsibility of dealing with the two points you raise-authority and priesthood instead
of continuing to answer some of the points in your first letter, as planned. You want "democracy in religion, and not a religion governed by a priesthood that claims divine authority." I regret your failure to see that the issue is not what you want, but rather what Old Testament Jewry calls for. Yet your demand will no doubt be seconded by many persons who do not discriminate between a God-made and a man-made religion, your viewpoint will no doubt be applauded during these times when the battle is on for the "four freedoms" that totalitarianism denies. That is because many persons fail to discriminate between the authority of the Church, which comes from above, and the exercise of the authority of the state which rightly comes through the consent of the populace. While all power comes from God, the authority of the persons who exercise such power, in a God-made spiritual society, is made known to man through revelation. It was set forth by Moses, and defined, as occasion necessitated, by the high priests and Sanhedrin (the high court) for the Jews, and by Jesus Christ, and the Church to which He delegated His power, for all the people of the world from the time the sojourn of Christ on earth ended. The exercise of the power of the State in the U.S.A., is by the consent of the governed, as defined in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights. The Jewish priesthood was an aristocratic caste of the tribe of Levi. Supreme authority centered in the house of Aaron, of the tribe of Levi, the office of High Priest, when vacant, being assumed by the eldest son, if he had the qualifications. This hereditary, genealogical priestly caste, was displaced by the priesthood without genealogy, in the Catholic Church; It is democratic insofar as the men ordained for service at the Altar of the Catholic Church are selected solely on the basis of their moral, intellectual and physical fitness, irrespective of their racial, national, or social status, or lineage. This democracy of the Catholic Church was recognized by President Woodrow Wilson, who said in his "New Freedom," "The only reason why government did not suffer dry rot in the Middle Ages under the aristocratic system that then prevailed, was that most of the men who were efficient instruments of government were drawn from the Church--from that great religious body which was then the only Church, that body which is now distinguished from other religious bodies as the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church was then, as it is now, a great democracy. There was no peasant so humble that he might not become a priest, and no priest so obscure that he might not become a Pope of Christendom; and every chancellery in Europe, every Court in Europe, was ruled by these learned, trained and accomplished men." Of course, a man-made church may be as
democratic as a social club. It may not only select its own rabbis or ministers, and
govern itself by the will of the majority, but it may also shape its principles by vote of
its membership, as it often does. But right reasoning compels the conclusion that a
God-made Church if such exists, must be governed by the will of God (as defined by its
priestly authority) and not by the will of man in a democratic or an autocratic manner. "All things, therefore, that they (the Scribes and Pharisees) command you, observe and do--for they have sat on the Chair of Moses" (St. Matt. 23:I-3). The Jewish religious system, as I said,
was hierarchical. It had its Sovereign Pontiffs, its High Priests. It had one visible head
in the beginning, Moses, who anointed his brother Aaron as the first High Priest, followed
by Aaron's son Eleazar, and in turn by successive first sons of the family of Aaron, who
sat on the chair of Moses. Jesus, the Messiah, is the High Priest of the New Dispensation.
He lives on through His bishops and priests, chief of whom are the occupants of the Chair
of Peter, which was instituted by the Messiah. The Jewish priesthood ceased to speak with
authority when the Veil in the Temple was rent, for shortly thereafter, on the First
Pentecost Day, the Church of the New Dispensation began to function. Yet the Jewish
priesthood continued to live a precarious existence, though without divine authority,
until the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 A.D. Its "last High Priest,"
says the "Encyclopedia of Jewish Knowledge" (p. 428), "was chosen
through political intrigue. He was not of the high-priestly (Aaronic) lineage, nor was he
in any way worthy of the office." |
|
|
|
|
|